According to a recent article there exists a gap between the
skills required by employers and what they are getting from recent graduates,
but there is another gap. There are differences
between the perception of employers, students and educators. This is a global issue and where the gap is
the largest employers believe only 43% are qualified while educators think the
number should be 83% (Mehta, 2012) . I agree with the educators.
Speaking from experience, many training pipelines only show
that you are trainable. The real
knowledge and know how come on the job. Doing
the job itself is a learning experience.
Does not the resourced based view of the firm rely on organizational
resources such as structure (Barney, 2001) ? How could a “graduate” obtain such expertise
as part of the educational process? The
article mentions employers teaming with schools, but if these skills are unique
then it would be a waste of time for at least some of the students. While the employer would create a pool of
talent from which to select, students not chosen are no more qualified.
Companies need to look at new “resources” (graduates) more
like a raw material to be shaped and molded by the processes of the company
instead of an “off the shelf” product.
Barney, J. (2001). Firm Resources and Sustained
Competitive Advantage. Journal of Managment , 99-120.
Mehta, S. N. (2012, 12
05). The "skills gap": As bad as (almost) everyone thinks. Retrieved
12 05, 2012, from CNN Money:
http://postcards.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2012/12/05/the-skills-gap-as-bad-as-almost-everyone-thinks/?iid=obnetwork
No comments:
Post a Comment